You were the main idea. My main idea. Not some supporting detail or background information. My thesis was that you and I would be happy together. But this essay didn’t turn out the way it was supposed to be. The introduction paragraph started as 100% everything was smooth and set. But as the essay went on, it started to get a little rocky. My evidence was not clear. My illustrations and explanations didn’t support my thesis of us “being happy”. All the details I put were on a whole different topic. The details about you did not support my argument. So the conclusion, consequently, came out to be not the best. The conclusion was ugly. Instead of restating the thesis of happiness, the conclusion was just about how I should’ve stopped writing and written on a new topic right after the introduction. I also question, why did I keep trying to write about something that simply did not make sense? Why did I go through the stress of revising and editing? Why did I spend all those nights and all that time working on an essay that would have never been successful anyways? All my friends looked at this essay and told me, you need to move on. You need to find a better topic. I should have listened to all the peer editing. I turned in the paper; knowing that I would get a 0 in return for all the hard work and effort I put in. But it’s okay. You just have to learn that you don’t need to stress about something that is not going okay. You have a choice to change it. You can have something better.
Side note. You say you are always the supporting detail, never the main idea. How come you never realized that you were were the main idea in my essay the whole time? Open your eyes and read in between the lines.
-@soumethadonna